So i have a Quarq PM and a Kickr Core.
I always trained using the values from the Quarq PM. However, today i accidently set the Kickr as the PM for Zwift to use while doing my workout. And this is where my issue lays.
I felt the workout was easy. (it was a 3x8 Muscle Tension workout). So on the 3rd interval, i went to the settings and changed the PM to the Quarq and holy crap what a difference!!!
Long Story short, i discovered that my Kickr reads about 20/25 watts more than my Quarq…
For now this isn’t an issue, since i can just use my Quarq all the time.
But in about 1month’s time, 2 month’s max, i won’t be able to use my Quarq when training indoors (and that’s where i’ll be doing most of my workouts…).
So my question is, when that time comes, how will i cope with the watts difference? i mean, if the kickr reads about 20 to 25 watts more, should i just bump the intensity of the workout when i’m training indoors?
Or should i go the other way around? Base my watt numbers on the Kickr and actually lower intensity when outdoors and using my Quarq PM? Since i have no clue which one of them is actually the correct one…
Any idea on what’s the best way to address this issue?
So i have a Quarq PM and a Kickr Core.
Went up Alp du Zwift today. Nice little experiment since i climbed it 3 weeks ago.
So comparing the exact same segment, starting from km 6.0 and ending at km 17.7 here’s what i found out…
3weeks ago using my Quarq Pm:
Heart Rate avg was at 151
Power Avg was always at Z2, sometimes at low Z3
Cadence avg was 69rpm
Today using Kickr Core on the exact same segment in Zwift:
Heart Rate avg was at 154
Power Avg was always at Z4. Sometimes SS, but mostly low Z4
Cadence avg was 71rpm
I shaved off 37mins total of my previous Alp du Zwift time!!!
So it’s a huge difference… The question now is, which PM has the true value, and which one is the incorrect one…
Since my training will be almost exclusively indoors, i’m thinking i should just use the Kickr Core from now on, and adjust the Training Zones based on this PM instead of the Quarq one?
As far as Zwift goes, 200 watts is always 200 watts as long as the bike you’re using in game is the same and you’re not benefiting from powerups (like drafting or the feather or whatever).
What percentage of your max HR is 154 bpm? From there you could gauge if either Z2 or Z4 power correlates best with your HR-based intensity.
For research, are you able to put your bike with the Quarq power meter on the Kickr Core and record the power numbers separately? Record on PM on Zwift and the other via a head unit/other device. Compare the two datasets after you’re done riding and, with your HR insights, determine how different the data actually is, and which data may best reflect your heart rate.
154 bpm supposedly is Z3.
Like i wrote in my first post, i did a workout where i tried both the kickr and the Quarq. And the work was a lot harder when using the Quarq, and the HR went up a lot as well when using the Quarq.
Untill that day, i never doubted the Quarq, since that’s all i ever used. But when i accidently used the Kickr i realized the massive difference between the 2.
At this point i’m thinking the Kickr might be the correct one after today’s Alpe du Zwift.
I wasn’t riding near my physical limit. What i felt was that i was at high Z2, Low Z3 most of the time when going up the Alpe. And looking at watt numbers alone, one would think i was riding at or above FTP most of the time… Which isn’t possible… So that leads me to believe that my FTP isn’t what i thought it was since it was calculated with the Quarq PM…
Yeah it’s a mystery. You always have your HR and feel to measure up to the reported power data. If you set your FTP with one source, then always use that source to train with if possible Frank talks about your indoor and outdoor FTP, which I think spans both your RPE and variations in power measurement indoor versus outdoor.
As far as comparing the two PMs, recording power data simultaneously from the Quarq and the Kickr while executing a workout is going to be essential. Record power from the Kickr on Zwift while simultaneously recording power from the Quarq on your head unit. After your workout is done, compare the power data graphs. This is a quantitative way to identify an offset in the power data.
And Zwiftpower.com has a free tool to analyse power from two sources, which will help a lot, once you measure both at same time (after calibration)
Is your Quark double sided? But it’s a huge difference and something other than leg imbalance is probably causing it, although might contribute.
Might also be worth asking to borrow a friends or asking a friend who knows their power numbers to try both of yours to give an anecdotal t
opinion on what one is closer to reality.
Yeah my Quarq is double sided.
Leg imbalance isn’t the issue either since i’m usually betweem 50/50 and 48/52 at most.
Gonna give that zwiftpower tool a try. Thx for the tip,